Thursday, January 30, 2014

Selling to Quarterlies

Howdy, fellow freelancers! Here's a slightly modified article I wrote a few years ago that appeared in Writing for Dollars. I  hope you find it of use as you seek markets for your work. 

Have You Considered Quarterlies?
By Susan Sundwall

A couple of times a year I give my submissions spreadsheet a good going over, looking for reprint possibilities and pieces that haven’t sold but still have potential. In a recent such move I noticed the number of quarterlies I’ve sold to and there were quite a few.

Many writers won’t consider quarterlies – or put them at the bottom of their ‘possible market’ lists – for the following reasons.

1.    Trying to remember due dates for various publications is bothersome.
2.    Issues are themed and some writers don’t like to be restricted by them.
3.    Too many quarterlies are literary journals.
4.    Pay is non-existent or low.

That’s why I never wrote much for them either. Then I took the bull by the horns and got some re-prints out there and – sure enough – three of them sold to quarterlies. For instance, The Lutheran Digest takes, even prefers, reprints and I sold to them. The editor took my essay about the family recipe box and that sale was number five for that piece.

Themes can be a bane or blessing. The bane part would come in the limitations set by an established topic not of one’s choosing. The blessing comes with having a topic to tackle from the get-go. It saves you from having to guess what to write about. Or worse, writing so far out of the publications parameters that you totally bomb.  But you might find that quite often the theme is broad. When you read the guidelines try to read between the lines a little to determine if your enchanting article about where best to invest your lottery winnings would fit into a broader theme of ‘family,’ or ‘finances.’ You might be surprised what an editor will consider.

Literary journals and magazines can be tough. Many of them pay in copies and if you only want the prestige of having your piece in one of them – well, okay then.

Now, as for those pesky deadlines. Simply make a log for them. Look at it in the first part of each new quarter to determine when you’ll need to get your work in for consideration. Note which ones take reprints and which tend to be themed. Try color coding. Add new markets as you find them.

So, are quarterlies worth it? I think so. The truth is they probably won’t yield you buckets of money. But here’s a little math. You set a goal of submitting three pieces a month to quarterlies. If your ratio of sales to subs is three to one then you’ve sold twelve pieces in a year. If each of those pieces garners $50 to $100 you’ve made anywhere from $600 - $1200 for that time span. Not a lot all by itself, but a nice little chunk of change to add to your other revenue streams. And if some of those are reprints, you’re that much further ahead in the game. Same goes for your evergreen pieces.

Take a look at these for starters.

The Lutheran Digest – Pays $35 http://lutherandigest.com/write-for-us/


Range Magazine – Pays $50 - $400 per article http://www.rangemagazine.com/guidelines/index.htm

The Georgia Review – Pays $50 per printed page http://garev.uga.edu/guidelines.html


Have a great Wednesday everybody!


Image: Free Digital Photos


5 comments:

  1. I remember seeing this in Writing for Dollars! It caught my eye then since you wrote it, of course. :) I'd forgotten about this market so I appreciate the reminder. Thanks a bunch!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Karen. Gosh, I'm flattered that you remembered! Hope you get some reprint sales soon. =0)

      Delete
  2. Thanks for these resources, Susan. They offer much reprint potential, as well as options for pieces that haven't sold yet, as you mention in your post. You are a font of information!

    Enjoy the rest of your week. Be well. :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're quite welcome, Janette. Happy writing!

      Delete
  3. Jennifer Brown BanksFebruary 7, 2014 at 6:45 AM

    Great leads here, Sue. Thanks for sharing this.

    ReplyDelete